<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Interest Group Holds Off On Lawsuit Against Soft Drink Makers</title>
	<link>http://growersandgrocers.net/2006/01/22/public_interest_group_holds_off_on_lawsu/</link>
	<description>From farm to table, and all the stops along the way.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Derrick Schneider</title>
		<link>http://growersandgrocers.net/2006/01/22/public_interest_group_holds_off_on_lawsu/#comment-93</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://growersandgrocers.net/2006/01/22/public_interest_group_holds_off_on_lawsu/#comment-93</guid>
					<description>ExtraMSG,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sad to say your argument sounds completely plausible as well. Politics is hard to follow sometimes with all the agendas and mixed motives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the record, the assumption about the soft drink marketing practices comes from the AdAge article, though books like Fast Food Nation put forth a lot of evidence to support the claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ExtraMSG,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sad to say your argument sounds completely plausible as well. Politics is hard to follow sometimes with all the agendas and mixed motives.</p>
<p>For the record, the assumption about the soft drink marketing practices comes from the AdAge article, though books like Fast Food Nation put forth a lot of evidence to support the claim.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ExtraMSG</title>
		<link>http://growersandgrocers.net/2006/01/22/public_interest_group_holds_off_on_lawsu/#comment-92</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://growersandgrocers.net/2006/01/22/public_interest_group_holds_off_on_lawsu/#comment-92</guid>
					<description>What they're doing is blackmailing the softdrink industry.  "Pay up or we'll make you pay."  They're probably threatening the industry with a lawsuit unless they make some concessions.  Essentially, it's plea bargain negotiations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, they want to play that game because it's expensive to sue an industry with deep pockets.  If they bring them to court, they might just lose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I also don't assume, as you did that they have "unfair and deceptive marketing practices." </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they&#8217;re doing is blackmailing the softdrink industry.  &#8220;Pay up or we&#8217;ll make you pay.&#8221;  They&#8217;re probably threatening the industry with a lawsuit unless they make some concessions.  Essentially, it&#8217;s plea bargain negotiations.</p>
<p>Of course, they want to play that game because it&#8217;s expensive to sue an industry with deep pockets.  If they bring them to court, they might just lose.</p>
<p>But then I also don&#8217;t assume, as you did that they have &#8220;unfair and deceptive marketing practices.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
