Rachael Ray and the Organic Movement


In her last post on the Well Fed Network, Sheryl Kirby made a comment that caught my eye. She said: “I’ve discovered that the ‘30-minute meal’ crowd really don’t [sic] want to know where their food comes from, and that’s so incredibly disheartening to me that it makes me want to cry.” As a member of the 30-Minute Meal crowd who buys organic, local produce and cares where her food comes, I was intrigued my Sheryl’s comment. After a little bit of research, I discovered that while Sheryl may think that way, there is at least one major player in the organic/local movement who would likely disagree.

While Growers and Grocers is about food production and markets in general, you may have noticed that articles here tend to slant to coverage of organic practices, the virtues of buying local foods and the slow food movement, which seeks to fight all things fast food by opposing “the standardisation of taste” and “defends the need for consumer information,” among other things.

I firmly believe that those who want to make 30-Minute Meals can do so while still accomplishing all of the aforementioned goals. Apparently, a major figure in the organic/local food movement agrees with me: Michel Nischan. He is the author of Homegrown Pure and Simple: Great Healthy Food from Garden to Table and chef at the Dressing Room: A Homegrown Restaurant (owned by Paul Newman). Nischan also opened “Pure, a restaurant in the Taj Lands End hotel in Mumbai, India, based on the ‘wellness’ recipes he developed when he ran Heartbeat in the W New York hotel on East 49th Street starting in the late 1990?s.” Nischan’s website describes him as follows:

A renowned chef, best-selling cookbook author and avid proponent of sustainable farming, Michel Nischan is credited with creating a cuisine of well-being. His cuisine is focused on a respect for pure, local, organic ingredients and their intense flavors ? without the use of highly processed, overly indulgent ingredients.

What may surprise some is the fact that, according to the New York Times, Nischan is also a regular contributor or Rachael Ray’s new talk show and other cable shows.

Instead of depracating Ray, Nischan apparently decided to understand that some people simply have a limited amount of time to devote to purchasing food and preparing it. He may also realize that some people have the time to do so, but choose to spend that time doing other things, like writing, spending time with loved ones, or volunteering, as the case may be. That does not mean that these people do not care about what they eat or want “fast food.” I applaud Nischan for embracing the realities of life and trying to help people eat well in a way that fits with their lifestyle. Someone who wants to eat organic, local, “slow food” may also want to cook it quickly.

[Photo from michelnischan.com]



Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Kendle Bryan - Bio
Heirloom Tomatoes a Hit

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Sheryl Kirby’s remark is so incredibly disheartening to me that it makes me want to cry.

I’m sick of people like SK making generalizations about such and such shows viewers.

Every single group of people that watch any particular show are all varied and incredibly diverse.

It seems more to me that people like to look down their nose at anyone who likes Rachael. THAT is so very elementary and ridiculous.

Thanks Cookie and Ali - it’s good to know that others agree with me.

i do agree that eating healthy should also be realistic. taking into account AVAILABILITY, COST and TIME, it is often not practical to always source organic or cook “slow food”.

everybody tries to live within their means and everyone should respect that.

Kayenne - I completely agree. It is so much less expensive to buy fatty ground beef than it is to buy organic, skinless chicken breasts. I think Jamie Oliver is taking that on as his next crusade.

hmmm… now that i think of it… i don’t think organic chicken is available here… there’s, of course, the free range sasso chicken sold by a neighborhood office on the side, costs 2.5 times more than the regular bird and i can’t even be assured that the feed used is organic. of course, i’m likewise not crazy about the idea that i’ll be given a LIVE chicken. i’ll end up having a pet, rather than dinner.

I am lucky to have a Safeway nearby my house and they just started selling organic chicken. Before that I had to go to a special store for it, like Whole Foods. Seems like there are more and mroe options as people learn more about what’s in the store.

I’d just like to point out that there was NOT a grammatical error in Sheryl Kirby’s sentence that you quoted.

In reference to the noun “crowd,”:

“if the members of the group function as individuals, the noun should be treated as plural.”
(http://www.english.uiuc.edu/CWS/wworkshop/writer_resources/grammar_handbook/pronoun_antecedent_agreement.htm)

Since each 30-minute-meal maker cooks in their own kitchen, we should be treating the crowd as individuals, and therefore the word “crowd” in Sheryl Kirby’s sentence should indeed be treated as plural. The use of the verb “don’t” is proper, as opposed to the implied correction of “doesn’t.”

I feel that this reflects poorly on both the writer and the editor, as it appears to be a foolishly executed act of spite.

Hey Berecca, thanks for stopping by Growers and Grocers.

I disagree with your opinion that my post was spiteful. It was certainly not intended as such. I was a writer at Growers and Grocers when Sheryl wrote her post and she knew I have a personal blog about Rachael Ray, so a response from me is certainly not surprising. In fact, Sheryl probably expected it.

I didn’t think she was being spiteful when she referred to the 30 minute meals crowd as a group of people who don’t care where their food comes from knowing that I have a blog about Rachael Ray. I thought she was just expressing her opinion. I also hope she does not think I was being spiteful. To the contrary, I was simply expressing my opinion about how the organic movement and Rachael Ray are compatible and how a star in that field apparently agreed.

My post addresses the merits of Sheryl’s comment in the open forum of Growers and Grocers. While I certainly agree that a debate can transform into a spiteful exchange, I do not think my post is even remotely spiteful. The post actually discusses Michel Nischan and Rachael Ray more than it discusses Sheryl.

I don’t think the readers of this post were expecting a grammar lesson, but “crowd” is typically treated as a collective noun, making the singular appropriate. I hope that this did not distract you from the substance of my post.

Actually Madeline, as the previous poster has pointed out, the plural is the more appropriate choice in this case.

You might also want to re-read your post and find both the spelling mistake and the typo you’ve made. If you’re going to be so tacky as to point out other people’s mistakes, you might want to ensure you’re not making any of your own.

How interesting that an old post is getting so many comments all of a sudden! Not that I mind, it’s just interesting.

Maybe some are focusing on the form because they can’t argue with the content?

Madeline, you made the form an issue when you made an issue of Sheryl’s grammar. There’s an old saying about people who live in glass houses…

As for the content, it’s not really worth discussing. Ray doesn’t discuss organics and sustainability on her show or in her publications. The fact that she has one chef involved in the SOLE food movement as an advisor is a good start, but it certainly doesn’t make her an expert or a role model in this area.

Tracy - I am glad we can discuss the content of my post. I did not assert that Rachael Ray is an expert or role model in the area of organics or sustainability. I merely stated that bringing a major player in that field onto her show evidences a concern about such issues.

In fact, Rachael Ray does discuss similar issues on her shows. Here are just a couple of examples off the top of my head:

(1) On her travel shows, she often lists Farmer’s Markets as “must see” places in cities she visits. Giving publicity to these markets certainly promotes eating local and/or organic.

(2) On her talk show she makes comments about how to be “green.” She made one comment on Friday about recycling. Even small comments are significant because of the size of Rachael’s audience.

She might not be out there crusading, but bringing Nischan on her show evidences her interest in the subject.

Madeline’s article was not written out of spite, and I’m sorry to see that Sheryl’s fans think so. Sheryl’s statement that “the 30 minute meal crowd” does not want to know where their food comes from is a sweeping generalization and the focus of the article is merely that not everyone can be thrown into that pot.